Evaluation of a "Webquest"

Konnichi wa minna-san. 

Ehm. Hello everyone. This is my evaluation of a webquest task. 

You can reach the webqust I evaluated from here

  

   Title is very relevant to the topic. Topic is about animes and the title is about being an "otaku".

For you, the description can seem not adequate but for me, as an "otaku" the description is adequate. But of course it is not detailed. Grade level range is appropriate too since the one below range is "9-12th" grade. Being otaku isn't just for the kids or teens. Keywords are relevant because being an otaku requires knowing those terms and keywords. 

  The introduction draws the reader into the topic. And answers nearly all the things about animes, I mean it describes animes perfectly; it describes animes the way that everybody can understand. The

task is very clear but it doesn't require synthesis of multiple sources of information. "It is simply collection of information." The process page is organized well. The resources are not stated. What this webquest lack is it doesn't have resources. Criteria for success are not described. I don't like the evaluation criteria because it is limited and requires specific talents like "drawing" "voice acting"...

   As for summary, conclusion is given, but I think it isn't detailed. There is no further message, idea or resources that encourage learners to extend their learning. The author can suggest anime films/series or cosplay conventions that they can join to extend their learning and understand how it feels being an otaku.